if i wasn’t neck deep in about a thousand other things, right about now, I’d do a up a new redesign for this here site. I’ve already got it all planned out in me little noggin. oh where shall i find the time? and is 1100px width (non-collapsing) too wide? Doesn’t everyone have apple cinema displays by now?
Comments:
Can’t wait Ed !
Base it off the BKG from your tweets — http://twitter.com/edfladung
hahaha ;-)
peace
Cool! Can’t wait to see it. I’ve been meaning to do the same thing for a loooooong time now.
Do you track you stats for resolution? I use Mint. Here’s a few stats from my site you might find interesting… Mint says 35% of my visitors are still at 1024 x 768. But, it also says that in terms of actual window width, 85% are over 1000 pixels wide, and 50% are over 1096 pixels wide. So, a fair amount of my visitors that technically have larger screens, still have their Browser window set between 1000 and 1096 pixels. At 1344 pixels wide the percentage drops to 13%. For me, 1000 pixels is probably as big as I would go.
Great stats Paul, i’m waiting new redesign too :)
Ed, please, put it in center, I do have cinema :)
i’ve been designing for 1000 lately and it seems to be okay. would love to see the new design… (yes, we got cinema, even in Mexico…doesn’t everyone?)
@ellen: go point.. haha.. ironic,, but true :) we do have cinemas here :)))
perhaps you could put the type in set columns or constrain it to a set width. its a bit of a nightmare reading a sentence that crosses the enitre screen. Other than the that, keep up the good work!
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Trackbacks:
Leave a Comment
I design for 960 wide. It’s safe. Most people have at least 1024 with a couple of 800s dancing around.